The State of Alaska, along with many other states for whom coal is an important natural resource, today (June 7th, 2024) filed a petition in U.S. District Court, District of Washington D.C., asking the court to vacate a recently adopted U.S. Department of Interior (DOI) rule that would, if left unchecked, severely undercut Alaska’s exclusive jurisdiction over the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations within Alaska.
“In this new Final Rule, the Secretary is overthrowing a longstanding deference to States on State-regulated mining programs. It also seeks to make the federal government the first regulator. But worst of all, it requires the Secretary to ignore vital information from States that could verify or disprove whether violations exist,” said Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor.
“For more than 40 years the State of Alaska has successfully exercised exclusive jurisdiction and oversight of the State’s coal regulatory program,” said John Boyle, Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources. “The DOI’s recently finalized ten-day notice rule subverts and convolutes the State’s preeminent role in overseeing Alaska’s coal industry by allowing those who oppose coal operations to effectively bypass DNR and seek alternative solutions from bureaucrats in Washington D.C. Yet again, this astonishing example of federal overreach runs counter to the recognition and deference that is given to the States that best possess superior expertise and knowledge of local mining conditions.”
The DOI Final Rule amends the existing “Ten-Day Notice Rule.” This rule allows, and has always allowed, DOI’s Office of Surface Mining (OSM) to become involved if states do naot promptly respond to criticisms about coal mining operations or permit compliances. For decades, Alaska has worked cooperatively and successfully with OSM and the public under the rule – responding to notices, working with mine operators, and working with the concerned citizenry.
OSM has praised Alaska for its regulatory practices with respect to both active mines and abandoned mine reclamation (restoration). Yet under the new Final Rule, OSM would prematurely insert itself into Alaska’s response actions, unreasonably expand the circumstances in which OSM would interject itself and invite citizen complaints without requiring the interested citizen to notify the state.
Alaska looks forward to working other petitioning states to nullify the Final Rule and restore the previous rule.
Be the first to comment