Temper tantrum is unprecedented in the history of the Alaska Judicial Council

Alaska is a special place. Whether you were born here or moved here, whether you live in a city or off the road system, whatever your race and ethnicity, we are all Alaskans. We share an interest in protecting what makes Alaska unique.

One of the things that makes Alaska unlike other states is our independent, non-partisan judicial selection system. For decades we’ve avoided the nasty political food fights that happen with the courts in other states.

Until now.

As former members of the Alaska Judicial Council (AJC), we have more than 12 years of experience in identifying the most qualified Alaskans to serve as judges. We are not attorneys, just concerned citizens who care deeply about our courts. Here is what we learned in our time serving on the council:

●Members of the AJC go through a comprehensive process to identify the most qualified Alaska attorneys to serve as judges.

●Qualifications include professional competence, diligence and administrative skills, integrity, fairness, temperament, judgment (including common sense), legal and life experience, and demonstrated commitment to public service.

●The judicial nomination system created by article 4 of our state constitution requires the AJC to forward the most qualified candidates to the governor, who chooses judges from among them.

This system is designed to ensure that our judges are uniquely qualified to read, interpret and apply Alaska law fairly and impartially in every region and community of our diverse state, without consideration of politics or influence from politicians.

Unfortunately, the AJC has taken a disturbing turn since the governor appointed Kristie Babcock, the wife of Governor Dunleavy’s former chief of staff, as a member. The council met last month to evaluate seven applicants for a seat on the Alaska Supreme Court. When the chief justice cast a tie-breaking vote that resulted in one candidate’s name not being forwarded to the governor, Babcock expressed outrage and revoked her previous votes in favor of three candidates. She then issued an op-ed full of untruths, accusing the chief justice and fellow council members of racism and bias against rural Alaskans. This is particularly egregious, since the individuals against which her accusations were directed collectively have decades of experience living and working in rural Alaska. They care very deeply about all Alaskans, and this is reflected in their votes.

Babcock’s temper tantrum is unprecedented in the history of the AJC, which is notable for its consensus on mission and collegiality between members. Split votes are exceedingly rare, and we have never seen a public rebuke via the press from a council member, attacking their fellow public servants on the council and the bench.

We question her motivation. It appears that she is seeking to convince Alaskans that the independent Alaska Judicial Council, which carefully balances the expertise and experience of lawyers and the chief justice with the perspectives of other Alaskans appointed by the governor and confirmed by the legislature, should instead be under the full control of professional politicians.

This is dangerous territory.

We know what that type of judicial selection system looks like, because we see it at work in states that elect their judges, or give politicians control of the judicial selection process. It results in judges who elevate their own political agendas and those of the politicians that appoint them above their responsibility to deliver impartial justice under state law. It also creates financial incentives for judges to stay on the right side of politicians, so they can keep their jobs. That’s the system that Babcock apparently wants, and she’s willing to destroy the system we have and the reputations of those who maintain it to get her way.

Ensuring that our judges reflect the racial and geographic diversity of our state is important. As women of color who have spent our lives and careers working for racial justice in Alaska, we don’t need a lecture from Kristie Babcock on how to achieve it. If Ms. Babcock is unable to participate in the AJC process respectfully, without airing her disagreements publicly and resorting to name-calling, she should do Alaskans a favor and step down.

There is nothing more important to protecting the interests of all Alaskans, including but not limited to rural Alaskans, Alaska Natives, and other people of color, than ensuring that our judges are selected based on their qualifications, and appointed without regard to their politics. Our system works. Don’t let anyone convince you otherwise.

Eleanor Andrews and Loretta Bullard

Eleanor Andrews served on the Alaska Judicial Council from 2000 to 2007. Loretta Bullard served on the AJC from 2015 to 2021, until Governor Dunleavy replaced her with Kristie Babcock.

Alaska needs a senator who will unleash the fullness of our energy potential

In many ways, Alaska’s lands are sacred; they have been blessed with rich resource endowment, which have always been the key to our subsistence and economy. The problem is that environmental extremists, now given renewed power by President Joe Biden’s administration, have prevented us from realizing our true potential of rising prosperity, self-sufficiency, and economic independence, balanced with environmental conservation.

Alaskans deserve a U.S. senator who will fight for an Alaska-centric agenda that will unleash our enormous energy potential to create jobs and lower our fuel costs, not one who bows down to extremists and enables a radical D.C.-based agenda that wants to turn our state into a national park for the rest of the country. My energy platform will promote environmentally responsible growth and job creation in the energy industries which drive the Alaska economy.

Permitting processes for oil and gas leases on public lands are onerous and time consuming, taking years to complete. In the case of access to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), federal regulatory restrictions were in place for 60 years before President Trump cleared the way for energy production. Biden then suspended oil and gas leases in ANWR on his first day in office.

When bureaucrats don’t support something, they love to drag out the process. “Go slow” means “no go.” It costs our companies a lot of time and money, which often makes projects cost prohibitive, preventing Alaska workers from earning money to support their families. When I’m your senator, I will call for permitting processes to be completed within a defined time frame.

As your senator, I also will advocate for Alaska and First Alaskans—not the federal government—to own a majority of the land in Alaska. Alaskans should have the right to access and develop resources on the federal land within our state. President Trump was in the process of transferring 28 million acres of land to Alaska before Biden took office and promptly stopped the plan. To make matters worse, Biden’s Interior Secretary Deb Haaland has started the process of seizing 44 million more acres, trying to take more land from Alaskans and federalizing nearly 73% of the state.

We are owed land by the federal government, it’s as simple as that. Alaskans know best how to manage and responsibly develop our land and resources. No D.C. insider cares about the Alaskan environment more than the Alaskans who live and work here. We also develop resources in a more environmentally responsible way than the other countries from which the U.S. imports when the Biden administration prohibits Alaskan energy production.

As your next senator, I will fight for timely completion of environmental and other regulatory reviews required for us to access and develop federal land. I also will demand the timely and orderly conveyance to Alaska of its public lands for potential development of natural resources.

Additionally, I will oppose carbon taxes on energy industries because it will increase costs on hard-working Alaskans who struggle to pay their bills. Carbon capture and sequestration technologies are much preferable to a carbon tax, because the private sector can develop and employ them to better deal with pollution, rather than simply making energy more expensive for Alaskans.

Our incumbent Sen. Lisa Murkowski has expressed openness to a carbon tax, as recently as October 2020, and it’s not the only area where she is failing us.

President Trump’s policies were demonstrably beneficial to Alaska, but Murkowski openly opposed him, both in his first election in 2016 and in his re-election campaign in 2020. This open antagonism of a president who was good for Alaska is not the kind of leadership our residents want. Nor does it help Alaska for Murkowski to openly support the Biden administration that is anti-mining, anti-oil and gas, and anti-Alaska.

Worse, Murkowski was the deciding vote in the Senate committee which advanced Haaland’s nomination for Interior Secretary. This means Murkowski is personally and singularly responsible for the imposition of the radical environmental agenda relentlessly targeting Alaska and opposing fossil fuel development in America.

A senator’s real value is in the big moments, the critical votes, and Haaland’s nomination was one of those crucial times. Murkowski’s approval of Haaland will cost Alaska billions of dollars. It may make her popular with the D.C. cocktail party crowd, but it seriously hurts us back here at home.

Murkowski also has failed to gain Alaska’s entry into an offshore revenue sharing agreement. Under the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas share hundreds of millions in revenues annually, which also support environmental conservation programs. Alaska has never been included in such an arrangement, which would have provided much-needed incentive for offshore exploration and production in Alaska. An energy revenue sharing pact for Alaska, similar to the one enjoyed by Gulf of Mexico states, would have grown the state’s economy, created jobs, and protected the environment.

All Alaskans ever want is fairness and the opportunity to access what is rightfully ours. The Gulf compact has been in place for 15 years and Lisa Murkowski has been in the Senate that entire time. Why was Alaska never brought to the table?

Alaska was once a place that afforded people abundant opportunity, but those days seem distant because of federal government overreach and overregulation, something our current senator has failed to adequately address. I have a fire in my heart to rebuild Alaska, and I believe that embracing the blessings of our bountiful natural resources is the key to that future.

This piece ran originally in the Anchorage Daily News.

Kelly Tshibaka, Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate in Alaska

Anchorage, AK

Example: 9075434113