Behind the Lies: No on 2’s False Narrative

I wore our nation’s uniform for 24 years. I voted in many elections, while active duty and since retiring. Most were as an Alaskan resident, moving here in 1993. Not one time, as a registered voter, was I denied my constitutional right to vote. Service members could always vote in primaries regardless of party affiliation before ranked choice voting (RCV) and jungle primaries were installed in Alaska in 2020. They can vote now with RCV, and if Alaskans vote to repeal RCV in November, service members will be able to vote in primaries as they did before.

The stakes are high with Ballot Measure 2, a citizen led initiative which aims to end the ranked choice voting scheme. However, don’t think for a second those who wish to “save” RCV in Alaska care about Alaska. How can I make such a bold statement?

The pro-RCV crowd have one mission, to spend millions of dollars of dark money flowing into Alaska from lower 48 billionaires and left-wing groups, in the hope of saving RCV from being repealed. Why?

Simple. Alaska is being used as the guinea pig to spread RCV to the rest of the nation. Our own congresswoman is spending time in other states pushing RCV. They are saying we love RCV, and it works great. Those two statements don’t hold up to scrutiny, even beyond the fear mongering lie about service members being unable to vote. Polling data has been consistent. RCV is not well liked by Alaskans and a sizable majority wish to see it gone.

Here’s the kicker – if Alaska repeals ranked voting in November, it will put the brakes on the pro RCV national campaign because the logical question across the lower 48 will be – if it’s so great – why did Alaskans repeal it after only 4 years?

Indeed.

Can you see it now? It seems “no low is too low” for those trying to save ranked voting – even going so far as to blatantly lie to our military men & women trying to “scare” them into voting No on 2. I find this despicable.

The dark money pro-RCV alliance has falsely claimed that repealing RCV would prohibit the military from voting unless they registered with a political party.

False! Not being affiliated with a political party does not stop anyone from voting in elections, including our military. It is deceptive at best, and election interference at worst, to actively undermine the democratic process by spreading disinformation to voters.

The pro RCV crowd is skating on thin ice. Will news, social media and others do the right thing and correct the false narrative? If not, perhaps Alaskan’s need to demand legal action. The dark money they claimed they would eliminate when they urged us to vote for RCV four years ago is now being used to persuade us to keep it.

When you enjoy a great meal at a restaurant do they keep spending money trying to convince you it was great? Of course not, you simply know. Alaskans know we got burned by the dark money lie and the ‘virtues’ of RCV the first time. Alaskans aren’t buying it this second time around.

Proponents of RCV understand repealing it in Alaska would undermine their national campaign, and their desperation to save it is evident. This explains why they have over 7 MILLION dollars of outside dark money being spent while Alaskans opposing RCV have only a few tens of thousands – almost all from Alaskans.

Talk about a David and Goliath battle! It’s time we told the lower 48 to butt out of our internal politics and leave us to be the fiercely independent political state we are.

Repealing RCV will stop the disenfranchisement of senior citizens, minorities, English language learners, and individuals with less than a high school education. Studies have shown ranked voting directly contributes to voter suppression among these groups. RCV is so troublesome in fact, the Alaska democrat party recently filed a lawsuit over a democrat candidate on the congressional ballot. They said RCV could “cause confusion and take votes from their ‘preferred’ candidate”. I agree RCV is a mess.

We can do better than this – and we must!

I have had the honor of serving Alaskans as a state senator for 7 years and have been at the forefront of election issues. It’s clear to me as a veteran and elected official the time has come to end ranked choice voting.

Send the message. Vote YES on 2 in November. YES on 2 will repeal ranked choice voting and put us back to a simple, easy to understand system of one person – one vote.

Respectfully,

Mike Shower 

Alaska Senate District O

Seizing Federal Lands is not the solution to the housing crisis

Nation’s Leading Native Organization Group Responds to Vance Debate Comments.

Asked in last night’s Vice Presidential debate for solutions to America’s housing shortage, Senator JD Vance reiterated the Trump campaign’s proposal to seize federal lands to build housing. The following statement is from Judith LeBlanc (Caddo), executive director of Native Organizers Alliance and NOA Action Fund.

The Trump campaign’s proposal to address the housing shortage crisis by seizing federal lands for development poses an extreme risk to Tribal sovereignty, Tribal lands, and sacred sites.

In last night’s remarks, JD Vance suggested that we “have a lot of federal lands that aren’t being used.” This is a dangerous view of our precious natural resources. As Native peoples, we don’t see our lands, waters, and wildlife as something to be “used,” but nurtured, protected, and managed sustainably for generations to come.

Many Tribal lands are held in federal trust. What would stop the administration from seizing our lands for their for-profit developments? We’ve seen time and time again, our Indigenous lands and resources developed, destroyed, and extracted for corporate profit. It is the right of sovereign nations to determine the future and use of our lands. Enacting a policy of seizing federal lands for development ignores the federal government’s obligation to consult and coordinate with our Tribal nations on land management.

Our National Parks and National Monuments are also federal lands which were forcibly taken from Tribal nations. Tribal nations and Native communities have made progress in re-indigenizing National Parks to restore the history and caretaking of those sacred places. Great strides have also been made in the last four years in federal-Tribal co-management of federal lands, waters, and other resources. This federal-Tribal partnership has strengthened protections of sacred places for the benefit of everyone. This should be the future of all federal lands management.

It is an overreach of the federal government and a violation of our treaties and Tribal agreements to enact a policy of seizing federal lands for development.

Native Organizations Alliance

Seattle, WA

Example: 9075434113