TRIGGER WARNING: This blog includes graphic content that some readers may find distressing.
Disclaimer: The names, characters, events and incidents are fiction. Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, or actual events is purely coincidental.
We know domestic violence is never okay. At StrongHearts Native Helpline, we hear many callers try to explain or make excuses for abuse. A common excuse for abuse is alcohol; victim-survivors and abusive partners blame the abuse on using alcohol. While we know using alcohol can strain a relationship, it is not the cause of domestic violence. It is also not an excuse for abusive behavior. The example below walks through such a scenario.
Our Favorite Bar
Yesterday Colin and I went out for dinner and drinks. We were having a great time talking about our upcoming anniversary. Colin was about two drinks ahead of me and he started getting obnoxious and annoying. I was kind of mean to him, but I was just trying to explain to him how bad it looks for both of us when he acts like that. While we were walking home, he had his arm wrapped around my shoulders, he tripped and almost pulled me down. I angrily threw off his arm and he fell and scraped his hands. When we got home he started crying and said the way I treat him isn’t okay. I feel bad about being mean to him and pushing him off me, but I wouldn’t have to do those things if he didn’t drink so much. Plus I was drunk and I would never push him if I was sober.
Tonight we decided to stay in and not drink. Colin brought up last night. He said he knows he can drink too much, but he still doesn’t think it is fair that I “berate” him and push him. I tried to stay calm but he can be so needy. I told him I’d never do that if we weren’t drinking and I wouldn’t have to do those things if he didn’t drink so much. Colin said I act like that sober too, but the only times he pointed out were when he had upset me.
He brought up the time that I broke his phone. We got into a fight because he was texting someone nonstop. I asked him who it was and he said work. When he went to the bathroom, I looked at his phone and I saw that the person he was texting was “Amanda”. I know all of his co-workers and none of them are named Amanda. After he came back I confronted him. He says I hit him, but if I did, I honestly don’t remember. I was in such a blind rage. I was so hurt. I threw his phone, but I wasn’t trying to break it. He kept saying it wasn’t what I thought. He said Amanda just started working at his office last week and showed me the emails to prove it. If he just told me about all the women in his life, that wouldn’t have been an issue. I know I can overreact and hurt Colin, but if he could just see the things he does that cause me to act that way, things would improve.
Alcohol Does Not Cause Abuse
In this story, the narrator uses alcohol as an excuse for their abusive behavior. They insist the reason for their abusive behavior – particularly the physical abuse, is because they are drunk. The narrator also implies they have to abuse Colin because he drinks too much. Neither of these excuses is valid. While abusive behaviors may escalate when drinking, drinking does not cause abuse, nor do anyone else’s actions.
The narrator abuses Colin when they are sober. When Colin confronts them the day after drinking they blame their actions on Colin. Denying the impact or severity of past actions is a common tactic of abuse. Blaming abuse on uncontrollable emotions is equally false. Abuse is not a loss of control, it is an active choice. Abusers feel entitled to power and control over their victims.
Additionally, when the narrator broke Colin’s phone, there were multiple abuse tactics present: checking his phone without permission, hitting him, throwing the phone, and blaming their actions on Colin. Regardless of substance use, the abusive partner is responsible for the abuse.
StrongHearts Native Helpline is a culturally-appropriate and anonymous helpline for Native Americans impacted by domestic, dating and sexual violence. Advocates offer peer support and advocacy, personal safety planning, crisis intervention and referrals to Native-centered domestic violence service providers. Visit strongheartshepline.org for chat advocacy or call 1-844-7NATIVE (762-8483) 24/7.
StrongHearts Native Helpline
Lame Deer, MT
AKPIRG requests an investigation of Gov. Dunleavy and Ben Stevens
The Alaska Public Interest Research Group (AKPIRG) has requested that the attorney general investigate the actions that surround Ben Stevens’ exit as Governor Dunleavy’s chief of staff to work at ConocoPhillips Alaska as VP of external affairs and transportation.
AKPIRG Executive Director, Veri di Suvero, stated, “Last Friday, we learned from the attorney general’s office the extent that Gov. Dunleavy and Ben Stevens went to circumvent Alaska’s ethics laws. They knowingly failed to follow protocols set in law governing when certain public officials choose to leave state employment.” di Suvero continued, “This violation of the public trust, and the way they ignored laws and waved away their responsibility to those laws, threatens the public’s confidence and trust in how conflicts of interests and ethics laws are handled and abused in the Dunleavy/Meyer administration.”
Ethics violations include failure by Gov. Dunleavy and Mr. Stevens to submit a copy of a written waiver to the attorney general in order to obtain approval or disapproval, as required by AS 39.52.180 (c).
Additional violations include the Governor and Mr. Stevens’ actions to circumvent the statutory process, set by Alaska laws, to impose necessary restrictions on Mr. Stevens’ employment activities after his tenure in the Office of the Governor in a policy-making position, pursuant to AS 39.52.181(a), (d), and (e), so as to avoid conflicts of interest for up to two years after leaving state service and to prevent corruption.
“The endorsement and enabling by Gov. Dunleavy to go around our ethics and conflict of interest laws so that his former chief of staff could land a top job at the highest levels of ConocoPhillips, a global enterprise with massive holdings in Alaska, betrays the public trust and interest, creates an unfair advantage, and is corrupt,” di Suvero said.
The complaint poses important questions:
1. Did Gov. Dunleavy consider what and how much privileged, confidential, and publicly undisclosed information, strategies, advice, opinions, etc. ConocoPhillips is now privy to, at the public’s expense, and certainly at the expense of other market competitors, now that they have his former top public official, his chief of staff, at their disposal?
2. How did he consider them?
3. When did he consider them?
4. Why was a copy of the written waiver not submitted to the attorney general?
“We expect this Governor and other public officials to follow the laws they have sworn to uphold. We deserve no less than the fulfillment of that promise. Corruption takes root when we do nothing to stop it,” di Suvero said.
The Alaska Public Interest Research Group (AKPIRG)